Fetishizing Refinement

A flash back: I’m at home. On the couch. The kids are in bed. The wife is watching TV. I’m combing through eBay’s endless stupidity for things I don’t need and probably won’t buy. I find something amazing, an old, Italian, pantographed stem. I turn the laptop, present it to the wife like a cat bringing a dead mouse to its owner. She snickers and shakes her head. “What is wrong with you?” she laughs.

This happens more than I’d like to admit.

Once, I read about the French classical pianist Hélène Grimaud. Among today’s classical musicians, Grimaud is known as one “who does not fetishize refinement.” The phrase stuck with me.

I have spent half my life gazing longingly at pictures of finely honed machinery and/or debating the merits of a thing that varies by millimeters from another thing. If you’ve ever uttered the phrase, even quietly to yourself, “Oooh, annodized!” you’re guilty, too. If you’ve ever justified your component preferences with the phrase, “…but, it’s Italian!”

This level of fawning gawpery requires a cognitive leap I don’t all the way understand even though I do it every day. Rather than appreciating a thing for what it can and will do out on the road or trail, I somehow divorce the thing from its use, shine it up bright and then place it high on a pedestal.

I fetishize it.

When we imbue inanimate objects with mystical qualities, a Mavic derailleur, Campy Delta Brakes, an old steel Merckx, is it because those things are particularly good at their jobs, or because we need something to pour our excess passion into? Is it because we can’t always be pedaling? Do we just need a totem, something to carry the meaning of cycling for us?

This is fetishizing refinement. Hélène Grimaud is not best pleased.

Andy Goldsworthy makes sculptures out of things he finds out in the world. Leaves, branches, stone, water. I like what he does. But, there are documentaries that feature his work and include commentary by the man himself, describing his motivations and approach. They are awful. They ruin it for me. The first rule of Fight Club is you don’t talk about Fight Club.

Have I been talking about Fight Club this whole time?

Once a thing becomes too precious, in my mind, the soul runs right out of it, like a pretty piano piece executed with machine-like precision, a pile of stone, precariously balanced against a steady wind, or an intricately carved lug that won’t hold a tube. At some point, cycling stops being cycling. It becomes so self-reflective, so fetishized, it’s inert.

I have been guilty of this, but I will try to do better.

Join the conversation
  1. khal spencer says

    Aside from all that, it is a beautiful stem. I have a couple of old highly polished Cinelli stems in a box that I will never use, and a gorgeous 53/39 Campy crank I might use if I ever move back to the flatlands again.

  2. erikthebald says

    I fetishized my carbon Campy Record parts from 1998 enough to put them on my cyclocross bike so that I could ride the dirt and country roads around my house recently. Then I realized that it didn’t have the gear range I need, nor was said gear range available, for the riding I want to do at this stage of my fitness and in this part of the world. It also didn’t work no matter how many times I adjusted. It seems like springs wear out even when not used. Maybe some day I’ll find a nice set of period correct wheels and build that 1985 Serotta Nova Special back up with the Record parts. I’m sure I can find a wall to hang it on.

Leave A Reply

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More